Debate Simulator
Claude's balanced reasoning produces genuinely strong arguments for both sides without favoring one. Gemini adds real-world data grounding to strengthen evidence claims. The round structure prevents either model from front-loading one position.
Simulate a structured debate on: {{debate_topic}} Position A: {{position_a}} Position B: {{position_b}} Context: {{context}} Format the debate as follows: **Round 1 — Opening Statements** (200 words each) Each side presents their strongest case with evidence. **Round 2 — Rebuttals** (150 words each) Each side directly addresses the other's strongest point. **Round 3 — Cross-Examination** (3 questions each) Each side asks pointed questions the other must answer. **Round 4 — Closing Arguments** (100 words each) Final appeal focusing on the single most compelling reason. **Judge's Analysis**: - Strongest argument from each side - Weakest argument from each side - What both sides missed - Verdict: Which position has stronger evidence (and what would change your mind) Rules: Both sides must use specific evidence, not vague appeals. No strawmanning — represent each position at its strongest.
Variables to customize
Why this prompt works
Claude's balanced reasoning produces genuinely strong arguments for both sides without favoring one. Gemini adds real-world data grounding to strengthen evidence claims. The round structure prevents either model from front-loading one position.
What you get when you save this prompt
Your workspace unlocks powerful tools to iterate and improve.
AI Optimization
One-click improvement with structure analysis and pattern suggestions.
Version History
Track every edit. Compare versions side-by-side with word-level diffs.
Folders & Tags
Organize your library with nested folders, tags, and drag-and-drop.
$ npm i -g @promptingbox/mcpUse Everywhere
Access prompts from Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT & more via MCP integration.
Your prompts, organized
Save, version, and access your best prompts across ChatGPT, Claude, Cursor, and more.