Ethical Reasoning
Ethical questions have no single correct framework. Forcing the model to apply multiple lenses produces balanced analysis rather than defaulting to one perspective.
Analyze the following scenario from an ethical perspective. Consider multiple viewpoints before reaching a conclusion.
Scenario: {{scenario}}
Reason through this carefully:
1. Identify the stakeholders and their interests
2. Analyze the situation through a utilitarian lens (greatest good for the greatest number)
3. Analyze through a deontological lens (duties, rights, and rules)
4. Analyze through a virtue ethics lens (what would a person of good character do)
5. Identify where these frameworks agree and where they conflict
6. Weigh the perspectives and provide a nuanced recommendation
Ethical analysis:Variables to customize
Why this prompt works
Ethical questions have no single correct framework. Forcing the model to apply multiple lenses produces balanced analysis rather than defaulting to one perspective.
Save this prompt to your library
Organize, version, and access your best prompts across ChatGPT, Claude, and Cursor.
Related prompts
Requesting confidence and key phrases forces the model to justify its classification rather than guessing. The structured output format works zero-shot because sentiment analysis is well-understood by LLMs.
Key Information ExtractionListing the exact fields to extract removes guesswork. The 'Not specified' instruction prevents hallucination when information is missing -- a common failure mode without this guardrail.
Question Answering with SourceGrounding the answer in source material and instructing the model to refuse when information is missing dramatically reduces hallucination -- the biggest risk in zero-shot Q&A.
Math Word Problem ReasoningExplicit numbered steps force the model to decompose the problem rather than guessing. The verification step catches arithmetic errors before the final answer.