Legal Research Memo
Explicitly banning case citations prevents hallucinated references. The 'describe principles, not cases' instruction still gives useful legal analysis without the risk of fabricated authorities.
Draft a legal research memo on: **Legal question:** {{legal_question}} **Jurisdiction:** {{jurisdiction}} **Area of law:** {{area}} (e.g., contract law, employment law, IP, data privacy) **Context:** {{brief_context}} Structure: 1. **Issue** — restate the question precisely 2. **Short answer** — 2-3 sentence conclusion 3. **Analysis** — discuss relevant legal principles, how they apply to this situation 4. **Key considerations** — factors that could change the analysis 5. **Recommended next steps** IMPORTANT: Do not cite specific case names or statute numbers — I will verify all legal authorities independently. Instead, describe the legal principles and the type of authority that supports each point (e.g., "under general contract principles" rather than citing a specific case).
Variables to customize
Why this prompt works
Explicitly banning case citations prevents hallucinated references. The 'describe principles, not cases' instruction still gives useful legal analysis without the risk of fabricated authorities.
What you get when you save this prompt
Your workspace unlocks powerful tools to iterate and improve.
AI Optimization
One-click improvement with structure analysis and pattern suggestions.
Version History
Track every edit. Compare versions side-by-side with word-level diffs.
Folders & Tags
Organize your library with nested folders, tags, and drag-and-drop.
$ npm i -g @promptingbox/mcpUse Everywhere
Access prompts from Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT & more via MCP integration.
Your prompts, organized
Save, version, and access your best prompts across ChatGPT, Claude, Cursor, and more.