Student Feedback Writer
The structure mirrors research-backed feedback models (praise-push-praise) and the word limit prevents overwhelming students with too much commentary.
Write constructive feedback for a {{grade_level}} student on their {{assignment_type}} about {{topic}}. Student performance summary: - Strengths: {{strengths}} - Areas for growth: {{growth_areas}} - Specific errors or misconceptions: {{errors}} Tone: {{tone}} (e.g., encouraging, direct, formal) Feedback should: 1. Open with something specific the student did well (quote their work if possible) 2. Identify 1-2 actionable areas for improvement with specific suggestions 3. End with an encouraging forward-looking statement 4. Be written at a reading level appropriate for {{grade_level}} Keep to 80-120 words.
Variables to customize
Why this prompt works
The structure mirrors research-backed feedback models (praise-push-praise) and the word limit prevents overwhelming students with too much commentary.
Save this prompt to your library
Organize, version, and access your best prompts across ChatGPT, Claude, and Cursor.
Related prompts
Requesting confidence and key phrases forces the model to justify its classification rather than guessing. The structured output format works zero-shot because sentiment analysis is well-understood by LLMs.
Key Information ExtractionListing the exact fields to extract removes guesswork. The 'Not specified' instruction prevents hallucination when information is missing -- a common failure mode without this guardrail.
Question Answering with SourceGrounding the answer in source material and instructing the model to refuse when information is missing dramatically reduces hallucination -- the biggest risk in zero-shot Q&A.
Math Word Problem ReasoningExplicit numbered steps force the model to decompose the problem rather than guessing. The verification step catches arithmetic errors before the final answer.