Vendor Evaluation Matrix
Weighted criteria with a defined rubric prevents evaluation bias and creates an auditable decision trail for stakeholders.
Create a vendor evaluation matrix for selecting a {{solution_type}} vendor for {{company_name}}.\n\nVendors being evaluated:\n{{vendors_list}}\n\nKey requirements:\n{{requirements}}\n\nBudget range: {{budget}}\nTimeline: {{timeline}}\nTeam size affected: {{team_size}}\n\nGenerate:\n1. Evaluation criteria with weighted scores (importance 1-5)\n2. A scoring rubric for each criterion (what defines a 1 vs 3 vs 5)\n3. A blank scorecard matrix I can fill in\n4. Key questions to ask each vendor during demos\n5. Red flags to watch for\n6. Recommendation framework: how to make the final decision
Variables to customize
Why this prompt works
Weighted criteria with a defined rubric prevents evaluation bias and creates an auditable decision trail for stakeholders.
Save this prompt to your library
Organize, version, and access your best prompts across ChatGPT, Claude, and Cursor.
Related prompts
Forcing the agent to plan before acting prevents premature execution and wasted steps. Explicit dependency mapping enables parallel execution and catches logical gaps early.
Tool Selection AgentThe ReAct pattern (Reason + Act) creates an explicit reasoning trace that improves tool selection accuracy. The error-handling rule prevents infinite retry loops.
Prompt CompressorExplicitly requiring all functional requirements to be preserved prevents the model from over-compressing and losing critical instructions.
Memory Management AgentExplicit memory read/write instructions create agents that improve over time. Categorization keeps memories organized, and the deduplication rule prevents context bloat.